Ford TW-10 (A) or Schlüter Super 1250 VL?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the TW-10 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Super 1250 VL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Ford TW-10 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 58% (22.1 L/min / 5.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Schlüter Super 1250 VL suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | TW-10 (A) | Super 1250 VL | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 93.4 kW (125.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 10” | 92 kW (123 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 1250 VL” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TW-10 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Super 1250 VL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TW-10 (A) and the Super 1250 VL. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TW-10 (A) and the Super 1250 VL. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 60.0 L/min (15.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 10” | 37.9 L/min (10.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 1250 VL” | AheadThe Ford TW-10 (A) has 58% more hydraulic flow (22.1 L/min / 5.8 gpm) than the Schlüter Super 1250 VL (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,680 kg (8,113 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 10” | 5,600 kg (12,346 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 1250 VL” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the TW-10 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 10”); the Super 1250 VL: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 1250 VL”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,836 kg (12,866 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 10” | 5,035 kg (11,100 lb) to 6,100 kg (13,448 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 1250 VL” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the TW-10 (A) and the Super 1250 VL. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 14 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 10” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 1250 VL” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 1250 VL” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TW-10 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 10” | 35 km/h (21.7 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 1250 VL” | AheadThe Schlüter Super 1250 VL has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford TW-10 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 10” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 1250 VL” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 10” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 1250 VL” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 10” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 1250 VL” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1979–1983 | 1972–1991 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford TW-10 (A) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Ford TW-10 (A) has 58% more hydraulic flow (22.1 L/min / 5.8 gpm) than the Schlüter Super 1250 VL (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Schlüter Super 1250 VL has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford TW-10 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Ford TW-10 (A) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TW-10 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Super 1250 VL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the TW-10 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 10”); the Super 1250 VL: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 1250 VL”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources