6 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor oneFord FW-401977–1982No measured PTO figureTractor twoWHITE 4-2701983–1988No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the FW-40 and the 4-270 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

6 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Ford FW-40 and WHITE 4-270, field by field
FieldFW-404-270Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed295 hp266.3 hp+11% FW-40
Engine declaredCummins V-903CATERPILLAR 3306 DITAdiffers
Displacement declared14.80 L10.46 L+42% FW-40
Transmission
Top speed declared18.6–21.7 mph · 30–35 km/h24.9 mph · 40 km/hdiffers
Clutch declaredHydraulically operated dry double clutchPedal operated wet multi-plate clutchdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared—Closed centre—
Pump flow declared20.0 gpm · 75.7 L/min——
Rear PTO speeds declared1000 rpm1000 rpm—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared30,631 lb · 13,894 kg30,214 lb · 13,705 kg—
Wheelbase declared132.5 in · 3,365 mm129.5 in · 3,289 mm—
Length declared267.0 in · 6,782 mm256.0 in · 6,502 mm—
Width declared—115.0 in · 2,921 mm—
Height, over the cab declared134.3 in · 3,411 mm124.0 in · 3,150 mm+8% FW-40
Ground clearance declared12.0 in · 305 mm27.0 in · 686 mm+125% 4-270
Fuel tank declared899.9 qt · 851.6 L921.1 qt · 871.7 L—

Ford FW-40 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford FW-40”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford FW-30”

WHITE 4-270 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-270”