Ford FW-20 vs WHITE 4-225

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1977–1982

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1983–1987

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the FW-20 and the 4-225 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 0 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Ford FW-20 and WHITE 4-225, field by field
Field	FW-20	4-225	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	207.2 hp	221.9 hp	+7% 4-225
Engine declared	Cummins V-555	CATERPILLAR 3208/V-8 Turbo	differs
Displacement declared	9.09 L	10.43 L	+15% 4-225
Maximum torque declared	—	343 lb·ft · 465 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–21.7 mph · 30–35 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Hydraulically operated dry double clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Closed centre	—
Pump flow declared	20.0 gpm · 75.7 L/min	31.0 gpm · 117.5 L/min	+55% 4-225
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	29,615 lb · 13,433 kg	22,758 lb · 10,323 kg	+30% FW-20
Wheelbase declared	132.5 in · 3,365 mm	117.8 in · 2,991 mm	+13% FW-20
Length declared	267.0 in · 6,782 mm	244.0 in · 6,198 mm	+9% FW-20
Width declared	—	116.0 in · 2,946 mm	—
Height declared	134.3 in · 3,411 mm	123.0 in · 3,124 mm	+9% FW-20
Ground clearance declared	12.0 in · 305 mm	28.7 in · 729 mm	+139% 4-225
Fuel tank declared	899.9 qt · 851.6 L	376.2 qt · 356.0 L	+139% FW-20

Source

Source