Ford 976 or New Holland 9682 (Traktorenlexikon)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 976 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9682 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The New Holland 9682 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 93% (86.1 L/min / 22.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The New Holland 9682 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 976 | 9682 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 268.5 kW (360.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 976” | 264.8 kW (355.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 976 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9682 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 976 and the 9682. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 976 and the 9682. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 92.7 L/min (24.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 976” | 178.8 L/min (47.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682” | AheadThe New Holland 9682 has 93% more hydraulic flow (86.1 L/min / 22.7 gpm) than the Ford 976 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 9,170 kg (20,216 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 976. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 16,350 kg (36,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 976” | 14,528 kg (32,029 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 976 is 13% heavier (1,822 kg / 4,017 lb) than the New Holland 9682 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 17,236 kg (37,999 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 976. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 976” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 976 and the 9682. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 976” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682” | AheadThe New Holland 9682 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 976 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 976” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 976 and the 9682. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 976” | 4WD / 4WD, equal wheelsTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 9682”; OECD test report 1816, 1999 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1988–1993 | 1995–1999 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 9682 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland 9682 has 93% more hydraulic flow (86.1 L/min / 22.7 gpm) than the Ford 976 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 976 is 13% heavier (1,822 kg / 4,017 lb) than the New Holland 9682 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland 9682 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 976 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland 9682 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 976 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9682 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources