Ford 976 or John Deere 8960?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 976 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8960 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The John Deere 8960 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Ford 976 and John Deere 8960, with the call on each
Question9768960Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?268.5 kW (360.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 976”272.3 kW (365.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8960”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 976 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8960 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 976 and the 8960.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 976 and the 8960.
Which pumps more oil for implements?92.7 L/min (24.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 976”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 8960.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—5,350 kg (11,795 lb) to 5,500 kg (12,125 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8960”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 976.
Which is heavier, for traction?16,350 kg (36,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 976”15,925 kg (35,109 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8960”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 976 and the 8960.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 976”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8960”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 976 and the 8960.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 976”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8960”AheadThe John Deere 8960 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 976 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 976”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8960”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8960”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 976.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 976”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8960”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1988–19931989–1993EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The John Deere 8960 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 976 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 976 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8960 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources