Ford 9000 vs International Harvester Farmall 1456
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 9000 and the Farmall 1456 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
7 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 9000 | Farmall 1456 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 145.0 hp | 132.2 hp | +10% 9000 |
| Engine declared | Ford 401 | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER DT-407 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 6.58 L | 6.67 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 372 lb·ft · 504 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | — | Pedal-operated dry single-plate clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 16.0 gpm · 60.6 L/min | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 7,055 lb · 3,200 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 1000 rpm | 1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 9,800 lb · 4,445 kg | 12,800 lb · 5,806 kg | +31% Farmall 1456 |
| Wheelbase declared | 91.5 in · 2,324 mm | 104.8 in · 2,662 mm | +15% Farmall 1456 |
| Length declared | 151.0 in · 3,835 mm | 164.0 in · 4,166 mm | +9% Farmall 1456 |
| Width declared | 91.1 in · 2,314 mm | 92.0 in · 2,337 mm | — |
| Height declared | 74.1 in · 1,882 mm | 86.0 in · 2,184 mm | +16% Farmall 1456 |
| Ground clearance declared | 25.3 in · 643 mm | 23.5 in · 597 mm | +8% 9000 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 11.0 ft · 3.35 m | 11.7 ft · 3.56 m | +6% Farmall 1456 |
| Fuel tank declared | 172.0 qt · 162.8 L | 168.0 qt · 159.0 L | — |
Ford 9000 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9000”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730”
International Harvester Farmall 1456 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 1456”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 1026”