Ford 8970 or Massey Ferguson MF 9240?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8970 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 9240 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Ford 8970 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 34% (2,311 kg / 5,095 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Ford 8970 suits road haulage better on this data: 14% (1,650 kg / 3,638 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Ford 8970 and Massey Ferguson MF 9240, with the call on each
Question8970MF 9240Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?176.5 kW (236.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8970”176.6 kW (236.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8970 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 9240 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8970 and the MF 9240.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8970 and the MF 9240.
Which pumps more oil for implements?126.8 L/min (33.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8970”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 9240.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?9,180 kg (20,238 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8970”6,869 kg (15,144 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”AheadThe Ford 8970 has 34% more lift (2,311 kg / 5,095 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 9240 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?8,685 kg (19,147 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8970”9,014 kg (19,872 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?13,650 kg (30,093 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8970”12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”AheadThe Ford 8970 has 14% higher maximum permissible mass (1,650 kg / 3,638 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 9240 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?18Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8970”18Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8970 and the MF 9240.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8970”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8970”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 8970.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8970”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 9240”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–19991994–1998EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Ford 8970 has 34% more lift (2,311 kg / 5,095 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 9240 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 8970 has 14% higher maximum permissible mass (1,650 kg / 3,638 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 9240 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8970 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 9240 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources