Ford 8870 or New Holland-Fiat G 210?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8870 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the G 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The New Holland-Fiat G 210 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 28% (1,991 kg / 4,389 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Ford 8870 and New Holland-Fiat G 210, with the call on each
Question8870G 210Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?154.5 kW (207.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8870”154.6 kW (207.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G210”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8870 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the G 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8870 and the G 210.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8870 and the G 210.
Which pumps more oil for implements?103.9 L/min (27.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8870”103.9 L/min (27.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G210”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,120 kg (15,697 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8870”9,111 kg (20,086 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G210”AheadThe New Holland-Fiat G 210 has 28% more lift (1,991 kg / 4,389 lb) than the Ford 8870 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?8,685 kg (19,147 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8870”9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G210”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?13,650 kg (30,093 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8870”13,650 kg (30,093 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G210”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8870”16 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G210”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8870 and the G 210.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8870”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G210”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8870”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G210”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G210”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 8870.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8870”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri G210”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–19991993–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland-Fiat G 210 has 28% more lift (1,991 kg / 4,389 lb) than the Ford 8870 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8870 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the G 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources