Ford 8830 or Massey Ferguson MF 6495 A?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8830 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6495 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson 6495A suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Ford 8830 and Massey Ferguson MF 6495 A, with the call on each
Question8830MF 6495 ACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?136.8 kW (183.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8830”136.2 kW (182.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6495”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8830 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6495 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8830 and the MF 6495 A.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8830 and the MF 6495 A.
Which pumps more oil for implements?109.8 L/min (29.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8830”110.0 L/min (29.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6495”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,070 kg (8,973 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8830”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the MF 6495 A.
Which is heavier, for traction?7,120 kg (15,697 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8830”6,300 kg (13,889 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6495”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 8830 is 13% heavier (820 kg / 1,808 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 6495A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?11,400 kg (25,133 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8830”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 6495 A.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8830”24 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6495”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 6495A has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Ford 8830 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8830 and the MF 6495 A.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8830”40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6495”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 6495A has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Ford 8830 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8830”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6495”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 6495A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Ford 8830 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6495”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 8830.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8830”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6495”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1989–19942003–2011Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 6495A is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Ford 8830 is 13% heavier (820 kg / 1,808 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 6495A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 6495A has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Ford 8830 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 6495A has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Ford 8830 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 6495A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Ford 8830 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Massey Ferguson 6495A is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8830 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6495 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources