Ford 8770 or Steyr 9190 a?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8770 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9190 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Ford 8770 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 139% (73.3 L/min / 19.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 8770 | 9190 a | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 139.7 kW (187.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | 139.8 kW (187.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9190 a” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8770 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9190 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8770 and the 9190 a. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8770 and the 9190 a. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 126.1 L/min (33.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | 52.8 L/min (13.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9190 a” | AheadThe Ford 8770 has 139% more hydraulic flow (73.3 L/min / 19.4 gpm) than the Steyr 9190a (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 7,480 kg (16,491 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | 7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9190 a” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,748 kg (19,286 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | 6,300 kg (13,889 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9190 a” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 8770 is 39% heavier (2,448 kg / 5,397 lb) than the Steyr 9190a (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 11,000 kg (24,251 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9190 a” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 8770. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | 32Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9190 a” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8770 and the 9190 a. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9190 a” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9190 a” | AheadThe Steyr 9190a offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Ford 8770 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 8770 and the 9190 a. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9190 a” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–1999 | 1993–1995 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Ford 8770 has 139% more hydraulic flow (73.3 L/min / 19.4 gpm) than the Steyr 9190a (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 8770 is 39% heavier (2,448 kg / 5,397 lb) than the Steyr 9190a (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 9190a offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Ford 8770 does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8770 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9190 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources