Ford 8770 or J.I. Case 2594 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8770 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2594 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Ford 8770 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 23% (1,380 kg / 3,042 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Ford 8770 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 18% (1,318 kg / 2,906 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
- The Ford 8770 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 8770 | 2594 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 139.7 kW (187.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | 139.7 kW (187.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8770 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2594 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8770 and the 2594 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8770 and the 2594 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 126.1 L/min (33.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2594 (DT). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 7,480 kg (16,491 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | 6,100 kg (13,448 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | AheadThe Ford 8770 has 23% more lift (1,380 kg / 3,042 lb) than the J.I. Case 2594 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,748 kg (19,286 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | 7,430 kg (16,380 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 8770 is 18% heavier (1,318 kg / 2,906 lb) than the J.I. Case 2594 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 8770 and the 2594 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8770 and the 2594 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | AheadThe Ford 8770 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the J.I. Case 2594 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 8770. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2594” | AheadThe Ford 8770 is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 2594 (DT) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–1999 | 1984–1985 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 8770 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Ford 8770 has 23% more lift (1,380 kg / 3,042 lb) than the J.I. Case 2594 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 8770 is 18% heavier (1,318 kg / 2,906 lb) than the J.I. Case 2594 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 8770 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the J.I. Case 2594 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 8770 is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 2594 (DT) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Ford 8770 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8770 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2594 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources