Ford 8770 vs J.I. Case 2590
12 material differences
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 8770 and the 2590 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
12 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 8770 | 2590 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 187.3 hp | 197.3 hp | +5% 2590 |
| Engine declared | FORD/NEW HOLLAND 675-TA-VH | CASE 504 BDT | differs |
| Displacement declared | 7.48 L | 8.26 L | +10% 2590 |
| Maximum torque declared | 632 lb·ft · 857 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | +33% 8770 |
| Clutch declared | Oil-immersed wet Funk multi-plate clutch | Pedal-operated wet disc clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic control declared | Load sensing | — | — |
| Pump flow declared | 33.3 gpm · 126.1 L/min | — | — |
| Pressure declared | 2,495 psi · 172 bar | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 16,491 lb · 7,480 kg | 7,998 lb · 3,628 kg | +106% 8770 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 1000 rpm | 1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 19,286 lb · 8,748 kg | 15,741 lb · 7,140 kg | +23% 8770 |
| Wheelbase declared | 118.3 in · 3,005 mm | 104.0 in · 2,642 mm | +14% 8770 |
| Length declared | 197.9 in · 5,027 mm | 175.5 in · 4,458 mm | +13% 8770 |
| Width declared | 112.0 in · 2,845 mm | 96.0 in · 2,438 mm | +17% 8770 |
| Height declared | 122.8 in · 3,118 mm | 115.0 in · 2,921 mm | +7% 8770 |
| Ground clearance declared | 20.0 in · 509 mm | 22.0 in · 559 mm | +10% 2590 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | — | 12.7 ft · 3.86 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 439.6 qt · 416.0 L | 339.9 qt · 321.7 L | +29% 8770 |
Ford 8770 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8770”
J.I. Case 2590 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2590”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2290”