Ford 876 or New Holland TJ-275?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 876 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TJ-275 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The New Holland TJ-275 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 62% (59.4 L/min / 15.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The New Holland TJ-275 suits road haulage better on this data: 12% (1,600 kg / 3,527 lb) more maximum permissible mass and 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 876 | TJ-275 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 208.9 kW (280.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 876” | 202.3 kW (271.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 876 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TJ-275 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 876 and the TJ-275. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 876 and the TJ-275. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 95.4 L/min (25.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 876” | 154.8 L/min (40.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | AheadThe New Holland TJ-275 has 62% more hydraulic flow (59.4 L/min / 15.7 gpm) than the Ford 876 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 7,109 kg (15,673 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 876. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 12,727 kg (28,058 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 876” | 14,422 kg (31,795 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TJ-275 is 13% heavier (1,695 kg / 3,737 lb) than the Ford 876 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 13,400 kg (29,542 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 876” | 15,000 kg (33,069 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | AheadThe New Holland TJ-275 has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (1,600 kg / 3,527 lb) than the Ford 876 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 876” | 16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | AheadThe New Holland TJ-275 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Ford 876 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 876. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 876” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | AheadThe New Holland TJ-275 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 876 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 876” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 876 and the TJ-275. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford Ford 876” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1988–1993 | 2001–2005 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TJ-275 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland TJ-275 has 62% more hydraulic flow (59.4 L/min / 15.7 gpm) than the Ford 876 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TJ-275 is 13% heavier (1,695 kg / 3,737 lb) than the Ford 876 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TJ-275 has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (1,600 kg / 3,527 lb) than the Ford 876 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TJ-275 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Ford 876 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TJ-275 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 876 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TJ-275 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 876 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TJ-275 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources