Ford 8700 (A) or WHITE 1870?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the WHITE 1870 is ahead on top speed; the Ford 8700 (A) is ahead on PTO speeds and drive.

  • The Ford 8700 (A) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 540 rpm.
  • The Ford 8700 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
  • The WHITE 1870 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Ford 8700 (A) and WHITE 1870, with the call on each
Question8700 (A)1870Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?74.2 kW (99.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”73.7 kW (98.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 1870”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8700 (A) and the 1870.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8700 (A) and the 1870.
Which pumps more oil for implements?66.0 L/min (17.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “White 1870”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 8700 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 1870.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,566 kg (12,271 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”5,397 kg (11,898 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 1870”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 8700 (A) and the 1870.
Which has the wider choice of gears?14Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”6 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “White 1870”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8700 (A) and the 1870.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 1870”AheadThe WHITE 1870 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 8700 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 1870”AheadThe Ford 8700 (A) offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 1870 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1870.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8700”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “White 1870”AheadThe Ford 8700 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the WHITE 1870 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1976–19791973–1974EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The WHITE 1870 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 8700 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 8700 (A) offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 1870 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Ford 8700 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the WHITE 1870 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources