Ford 8630 or Lamborghini 135 DT Formula?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8630 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 135 DT Formula has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Ford 8630 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 76% (46.2 L/min / 12.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 57% (2,918 kg / 6,433 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Ford 8630 and Lamborghini 135 DT Formula, with the call on each
Question8630135 DT FormulaCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?97.1 kW (130.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8630”97.1 kW (130.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8630 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 135 DT Formula has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8630 and the 135 DT Formula.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8630 and the 135 DT Formula.
Which pumps more oil for implements?107.1 L/min (28.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8630”60.9 L/min (16.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”AheadThe Ford 8630 has 76% more hydraulic flow (46.2 L/min / 12.2 gpm) than the Lamborghini 135 DT Formula (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?8,080 kg (17,813 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8630”5,162 kg (11,380 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”AheadThe Ford 8630 has 57% more lift (2,918 kg / 6,433 lb) than the Lamborghini 135 DT Formula (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?8,346 kg (18,400 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8630”4,680 kg (10,318 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 8630 is 78% heavier (3,666 kg / 8,082 lb) than the Lamborghini 135 DT Formula (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?10,474 kg (23,091 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8630”8,100 kg (17,857 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”AheadThe Ford 8630 has 29% higher maximum permissible mass (2,374 kg / 5,234 lb) than the Lamborghini 135 DT Formula (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8630”24 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”AheadThe Lamborghini 135 DT Formula has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Ford 8630 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8630 and the 135 DT Formula.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8630”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”AheadThe Lamborghini 135 DT Formula has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Ford 8630 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8630”540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8630”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8630”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1989–19941991–1996EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Ford 8630 has 76% more hydraulic flow (46.2 L/min / 12.2 gpm) than the Lamborghini 135 DT Formula (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 8630 has 57% more lift (2,918 kg / 6,433 lb) than the Lamborghini 135 DT Formula (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 8630 is 78% heavier (3,666 kg / 8,082 lb) than the Lamborghini 135 DT Formula (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 8630 has 29% higher maximum permissible mass (2,374 kg / 5,234 lb) than the Lamborghini 135 DT Formula (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini 135 DT Formula has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Ford 8630 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini 135 DT Formula has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Ford 8630 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8630 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 135 DT Formula has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources