Ford 8000 vs SAME Buffalo DT
11 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 8000 and the Buffalo DT → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
11 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 8000 | Buffalo DT | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 108.5 hp | 103.5 hp | — |
| Engine declared | Ford 401 | SAME DA 1006-V | differs |
| Displacement declared | 6.58 L | 5.66 L | +16% 8000 |
| Maximum torque declared | 283 lb·ft · 384 N·m | 280 lb·ft · 380 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | +20% 8000 |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated dry single-plate clutch | Pedal-operated dry SAME single-disc clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 12.0 gpm · 45.4 L/min | 7.9 gpm · 30.0 L/min | +51% 8000 |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 7,055 lb · 3,200 kg | 6,614 lb · 3,000 kg | +7% 8000 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 9,978 lb · 4,526 kg | 9,524 lb · 4,320 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 91.5 in · 2,324 mm | 100.8 in · 2,560 mm | +10% Buffalo DT |
| Length declared | 148.3 in · 3,767 mm | 157.5 in · 4,000 mm | +6% Buffalo DT |
| Width declared | 85.0 in · 2,159 mm | 85.8 in · 2,180 mm | — |
| Height declared | 74.0 in · 1,880 mm | 75.6 in · 1,920 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 25.3 in · 643 mm | 17.3 in · 440 mm | +46% 8000 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 11.0 ft · 3.35 m | 16.4 ft · 5.00 m | +49% Buffalo DT |
| Fuel tank declared | 172.0 qt · 162.8 L | — | — |
Ford 8000 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8000”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8730”
SAME Buffalo DT sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Buffalo”