Ford 8000 vs International Harvester 966

13 material differences

Tractor one

1968–1972

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1971–1974

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 8000 and the 966 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

13 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Ford 8000 and International Harvester 966, field by field
Field	8000	966	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	108.5 hp	95.6 hp	+13% 8000
Engine declared	Ford 401	INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER D-414	differs
Displacement declared	6.58 L	6.78 L	—
Maximum torque declared	283 lb·ft · 384 N·m	305 lb·ft · 414 N·m	+8% 966
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated dry single-plate clutch	Pedal-operated DYNA-LIFE clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	12.0 gpm · 45.4 L/min	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	7,055 lb · 3,200 kg	5,000 lb · 2,268 kg	+41% 8000
Rear PTO speeds declared	1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	9,978 lb · 4,526 kg	11,625 lb · 5,273 kg	+17% 966
Wheelbase declared	91.5 in · 2,324 mm	104.8 in · 2,662 mm	+15% 966
Length declared	148.3 in · 3,767 mm	165.0 in · 4,191 mm	+11% 966
Width declared	85.0 in · 2,159 mm	98.0 in · 2,489 mm	+15% 966
Height declared	74.0 in · 1,880 mm	105.0 in · 2,667 mm	+42% 966
Ground clearance declared	25.3 in · 643 mm	14.0 in · 356 mm	+81% 8000
Turning radius, braked declared	11.0 ft · 3.35 m	11.8 ft · 3.61 m	+8% 966
Fuel tank declared	172.0 qt · 162.8 L	147.9 qt · 140.0 L	+16% 8000

Source

Source