Ford 7710 or Massey Ferguson MF 3090 (A)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Ford 7710: hydraulic flow. On features, the Massey Ferguson MF 3090 (A) is ahead on forward gears.

  • The Ford 7710 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 35% (17.7 L/min / 4.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Ford 7710 and Massey Ferguson MF 3090 (A), with the call on each
Question7710MF 3090 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?64.5 kW (86.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”64.7 kW (86.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7710 and the MF 3090 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7710 and the MF 3090 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?68.9 L/min (18.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”51.2 L/min (13.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”AheadThe Ford 7710 has 35% more hydraulic flow (17.7 L/min / 4.7 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3090 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,255 kg (9,381 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”3,875 kg (8,543 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,430 kg (9,766 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”4,190 kg (9,237 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 7710.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 3090 (A) has 100% more forward gears (16 gears) than the Ford 7710 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 7710 and the MF 3090 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 7710.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3090”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1981–19911986–1990Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 3090 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Ford 7710 has 35% more hydraulic flow (17.7 L/min / 4.7 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3090 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3090 (A) has 100% more forward gears (16 gears) than the Ford 7710 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3090 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources