Ford 7700 (A) or Lamborghini R-904 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 7700 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-904 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Ford 7700 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 69% (16.8 L/min / 4.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Ford 7700 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Ford 7700 (A) and Lamborghini R-904 (DT), with the call on each
Question7700 (A)R-904 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?67.7 kW (90.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7700”67.7 kW (90.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 904 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7700 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-904 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7700 (A) and the R-904 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7700 (A) and the R-904 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?41.0 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7700”24.2 L/min (6.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 904 DT”AheadThe Ford 7700 (A) has 69% more hydraulic flow (16.8 L/min / 4.4 gpm) than the Lamborghini R-904 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,670 kg (5,886 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7700”2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 904 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 7700 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7700”); the R-904 (DT): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 904 DT”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,767 kg (8,305 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7700”3,010 kg (6,636 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 904 DT”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 7700 (A) is 25% heavier (757 kg / 1,669 lb) than the Lamborghini R-904 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 7700 (A) and the R-904 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7700”12Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 904 DT”AheadThe Ford 7700 (A) has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Lamborghini R-904 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 7700 (A) and the R-904 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7700”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 904 DT”AheadThe Ford 7700 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Lamborghini R-904 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7700”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 904 DT”AheadThe Ford 7700 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Lamborghini R-904 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7700”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the R-904 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7700”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 904 DT”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1976–19811976–1982EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Ford 7700 (A) has 69% more hydraulic flow (16.8 L/min / 4.4 gpm) than the Lamborghini R-904 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 7700 (A) is 25% heavier (757 kg / 1,669 lb) than the Lamborghini R-904 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 7700 (A) has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Lamborghini R-904 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 7700 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Lamborghini R-904 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 7700 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Lamborghini R-904 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7700 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-904 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 7700 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7700”); the R-904 (DT): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 904 DT”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources