Ford 7600 (A) or Massey Ferguson MF 1085?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Ford 7600 (A): hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on top speed and drive.
- The Ford 7600 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 37% (9.9 L/min / 2.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Ford 7600 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 7600 (A) | MF 1085 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 60.8 kW (81.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7600” | 60.8 kW (81.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7600 (A) and the MF 1085. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7600 (A) and the MF 1085. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 36.4 L/min (9.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7600” | 26.5 L/min (7.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085” | AheadThe Ford 7600 (A) has 37% more hydraulic flow (9.9 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1085 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,700 kg (5,952 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7600” | 2,800 kg (6,173 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,771 kg (6,109 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7600” | 3,851 kg (8,490 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 1085 is 39% heavier (1,080 kg / 2,381 lb) than the Ford 7600 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 7600 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7600” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 7600 (A) and the MF 1085. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7600” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085” | AheadThe Ford 7600 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1085 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7600” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7600” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7600” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1085” | AheadThe Ford 7600 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson MF 1085 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1975–1981 | 1973–1978 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Ford 7600 (A) has 37% more hydraulic flow (9.9 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1085 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 1085 is 39% heavier (1,080 kg / 2,381 lb) than the Ford 7600 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 7600 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1085 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 7600 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson MF 1085 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources