Ford 7095 (A) or VALMET 1100?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 7095 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Ford 7095 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
- The VALMET 1100 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 7095 (A) | 1100 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 77 kW (103 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | 77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1100” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7095 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7095 (A) and the 1100. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7095 (A) and the 1100. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 45.2 L/min (11.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1100” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 7095 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,300 kg (7,275 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | 2,450 kg (5,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1100” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 7095 (A): lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095”); the 1100: lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1100”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,800 kg (8,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | 3,715 kg (8,190 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1100” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 7095 (A) and the 1100. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1100” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 7095 (A) and the 1100. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1100” | AheadThe VALMET 1100 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 7095 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1100” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1100. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1100” | AheadThe Ford 7095 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the VALMET 1100 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1976–1981 | 1969–1974 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 7095 (A) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The VALMET 1100 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 7095 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 7095 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the VALMET 1100 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Ford 7095 (A) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7095 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 7095 (A): lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7095”); the 1100: lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1100”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources