Ford 6600 (A) or Lamborghini R-475 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the Ford 6600 (A) is ahead on hydraulic flow; the Lamborghini R-475 (DT) is ahead on three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Ford 6600 (A) and Lamborghini R-475 (DT), with the call on each
Question6600 (A)R-475 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?49.4 kW (66.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 6600”49.4 kW (66.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 475 (DT)”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6600 (A) and the R-475 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6600 (A) and the R-475 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?35.0 L/min (9.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 6600”24.2 L/min (6.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 475 (DT)”AheadThe Ford 6600 (A) has 45% more hydraulic flow (10.8 L/min / 2.9 gpm) than the Lamborghini R-475 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,150 kg (4,740 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 6600”2,734 kg (6,027 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 475 (DT)”AheadThe Lamborghini R-475 (DT) has 27% more lift (584 kg / 1,287 lb) than the Ford 6600 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,250 kg (7,165 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 6600”2,742 kg (6,045 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 475 (DT)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 6600 (A) is 19% heavier (508 kg / 1,120 lb) than the Lamborghini R-475 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6600 (A) and the R-475 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 6600”12Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 475 (DT)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6600 (A) and the R-475 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 6600”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 475 (DT)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 6600”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 475 (DT)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 6600”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 475 (DT)”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 6600”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 475 (DT)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1975–19811971–1973EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Ford 6600 (A) has 45% more hydraulic flow (10.8 L/min / 2.9 gpm) than the Lamborghini R-475 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini R-475 (DT) has 27% more lift (584 kg / 1,287 lb) than the Ford 6600 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 6600 (A) is 19% heavier (508 kg / 1,120 lb) than the Lamborghini R-475 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources