6 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor oneFord 6401954–1957No measured PTO figureTractor twoMASSEY-HARRIS 2031940–1947No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 640 and the 203 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

6 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Ford 640 and MASSEY-HARRIS 203, field by field
Field640203Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed31.9 hp31.9 hp—
Engine declared—CONTINENTAL M-330—
Displacement declared—5.41 L—
Transmission
Top speed declared12.4 mph · 20 km/h12.4 mph · 20 km/h—
Clutch declared—Pedal operated dry Borg and Beck single plate clutch type 11 inches—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared2.7–6.0 gpm · 10.2–22.7 L/min——
Rear PTO speeds declared540 rpm540 rpm—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared3,018 lb · 1,369 kg6,605 lb · 2,996 kg+119% 203
Wheelbase declared74.5 in · 1,892 mm89.0 in · 2,261 mm+20% 203
Length declared120.8 in · 3,069 mm139.5 in · 3,543 mm+15% 203
Width declared63.9–87.5 in · 1,623–2,223 mm69.0 in · 1,753 mmdiffers
Height, over the steering wheel declared56.9 in · 1,446 mm59.3 in · 1,505 mm—
Ground clearance declared21.0 in · 533 mm12.8 in · 324 mm+65% 640
Turning radius, braked declared18.0 ft · 5.49 m——
Fuel tank declared52.8 qt · 50.0 L115.2 qt · 109.0 L+118% 203

Ford 640 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 600”

MASSEY-HARRIS 203 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 203”