Ford 5640 (A) or Lamborghini 775 F-Plus?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 5640 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 775 F-Plus has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Lamborghini 775 F-Plus suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 65% (22.0 L/min / 5.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 5640 (A) | 775 F-Plus | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 55.2 kW (74.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5640” | 55.2 kW (74.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5640 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 775 F-Plus has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5640 (A) and the 775 F-Plus. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5640 (A) and the 775 F-Plus. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 34.0 L/min (9.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5640” | 56.0 L/min (14.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus” | AheadThe Lamborghini 775 F-Plus has 65% more hydraulic flow (22.0 L/min / 5.8 gpm) than the Ford 5640 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,880 kg (6,349 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5640” | 2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,687 kg (8,128 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5640” | 2,625 kg (5,787 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 5640 (A) is 40% heavier (1,062 kg / 2,341 lb) than the Lamborghini 775 F-Plus (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5640 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5640” | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5640 (A) and the 775 F-Plus. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5640” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 5640” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 5640” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 775 F-Plus. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 5640” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 775 F-Plus” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1991–1997 | 1992–2005 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lamborghini 775 F-Plus has 65% more hydraulic flow (22.0 L/min / 5.8 gpm) than the Ford 5640 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 5640 (A) is 40% heavier (1,062 kg / 2,341 lb) than the Lamborghini 775 F-Plus (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5640 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 775 F-Plus has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources