Ford 5600 (A) or International Harvester 744?
Which should you choose?
The figures split: the Ford 5600 (A) is ahead on hydraulic flow and PTO speeds; the International Harvester 744 is ahead on three-point lift.
- The Ford 5600 (A) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 5600 (A) | 744 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 42.5 kW (57.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5600” | 42.7 kW (57.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 744” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5600 (A) and the 744. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5600 (A) and the 744. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 36.6 L/min (9.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5600” | 27.2 L/min (7.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 744” | AheadThe Ford 5600 (A) has 35% more hydraulic flow (9.4 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the International Harvester 744 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,876 kg (4,136 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5600” | 2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 744” | AheadThe International Harvester 744 has 55% more lift (1,024 kg / 2,258 lb) than the Ford 5600 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,250 kg (7,165 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5600” | 3,080 kg (6,790 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 744” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 5,650 kg (12,456 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 744” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5600 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5600” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 744” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5600 (A) and the 744. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5600” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 744” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 5600” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 744” | AheadThe Ford 5600 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the International Harvester 744 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 5600” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 744” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 5600” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 744” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1975–1981 | 1974–1980 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Ford 5600 (A) has 35% more hydraulic flow (9.4 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the International Harvester 744 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 744 has 55% more lift (1,024 kg / 2,258 lb) than the Ford 5600 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 5600 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the International Harvester 744 does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources