Ford 5030 (A) vs VALMET 465 (465-4)

12 material differences

Tractor one

Ford 5030 (A)

1992–1996

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

VALMET 465 (465-4)

1993–1997

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 5030 (A) and the 465 (465-4) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

12 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Ford 5030 (A) and VALMET 465 (465-4), field by field
Field5030 (A)465 (465-4)Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed69.1 hp69.1 hp
Engine declaredFord C 256 CID-NAVALMET 320 DSdiffers
Displacement declared4.19 L3.30 L+27% 5030 (A)
Maximum torque declared176 lb·ft · 239 N·m192 lb·ft · 260 N·m+9% 465 (465-4)
Transmission
Top speed declared18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h
Clutch declaredPedal operated dry AP single plate clutchdry LuK double clutchdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declaredOpen centreOpen centre
Pump flow declared9.2 gpm · 34.8 L/min14.5 gpm · 55.0 L/min+58% 465 (465-4)
Pressure declared1,508 psi · 104 bar2,901 psi · 200 bar+92% 465 (465-4)
Three-point lift at ends declared4,381 lb · 1,987 kg5,688 lb · 2,580 kg+30% 465 (465-4)
Rear PTO speeds declared540 rpm540E/540 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared6,217 lb · 2,820 kg6,217 lb · 2,820 kg
Wheelbase declared89.6 in · 2,276 mm83.1 in · 2,112 mm+8% 5030 (A)
Length declared143.7 in · 3,650 mm146.1 in · 3,710 mm
Width declared72.2 in · 1,835 mm79.9 in · 2,030 mm+11% 465 (465-4)
Height declared100.3 in · 2,548 mm102.6 in · 2,605 mm
Ground clearance declared13.9 in · 353 mm15.9 in · 405 mm+15% 465 (465-4)
Turning radius, braked declared11.5 ft · 3.50 m
Fuel tank declared69.4 qt · 65.7 L77.1 qt · 73.0 L+11% 465 (465-4)

Ford 5030 (A) sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5030”

VALMET 465 (465-4) sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 465”