Ford 5000 (A) or Volvo T 500 (Volvo)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 5000 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 500 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Volvo T 500 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 94% (21.8 L/min / 5.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 5000 (A) | T 500 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 45.6 kW (61.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5000” | 44.9 kW (60.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 500” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5000 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 500 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5000 (A) and the T 500. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5000 (A) and the T 500. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 23.2 L/min (6.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5000” | 45.0 L/min (11.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 500” | AheadThe Volvo T 500 has 94% more hydraulic flow (21.8 L/min / 5.8 gpm) than the Ford 5000 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,588 kg (3,501 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5000” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the T 500. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,519 kg (5,553 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5000” | 2,980 kg (6,570 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 500” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Volvo T 500 is 18% heavier (461 kg / 1,016 lb) than the Ford 5000 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5000 (A) and the T 500. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5000” | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 500” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5000 (A) and the T 500. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 28 km/h (17.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5000” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 500” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 5000” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 500” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 5000” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 500” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 5000” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 500” | AheadThe Ford 5000 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Volvo T 500 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1964–1975 | 1974–1978 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Volvo T 500 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Volvo T 500 has 94% more hydraulic flow (21.8 L/min / 5.8 gpm) than the Ford 5000 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Volvo T 500 is 18% heavier (461 kg / 1,016 lb) than the Ford 5000 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 5000 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Volvo T 500 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Volvo T 500 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5000 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 500 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources