Ford 4830 (A) or VALMET 455/445-4?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the Ford 4830 (A) is ahead on hydraulic flow; the VALMET 455/445-4 is ahead on three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Ford 4830 (A) and VALMET 455/445-4, with the call on each
Question4830 (A)455/445-4Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?41.6 kW (55.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”41.4 kW (55.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 4830 (A) and the 455/445-4.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 4830 (A) and the 455/445-4.
Which pumps more oil for implements?35.3 L/min (9.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”31.6 L/min (8.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”AheadThe Ford 4830 (A) has 12% more hydraulic flow (3.7 L/min / 1.0 gpm) than the VALMET 455/445-4 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,987 kg (4,381 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”2,640 kg (5,820 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”AheadThe VALMET 455/445-4 has 33% more lift (653 kg / 1,440 lb) than the Ford 4830 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,960 kg (6,526 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”2,720 kg (5,997 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 4830 (A) and the 455/445-4.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 4830 (A) and the 455/445-4.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 455/445-4.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 4830”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 455”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19921989–1994EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Ford 4830 (A) has 12% more hydraulic flow (3.7 L/min / 1.0 gpm) than the VALMET 455/445-4 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 455/445-4 has 33% more lift (653 kg / 1,440 lb) than the Ford 4830 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources