Ford 4635 (A) or New Holland TN-65 D/S (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 4635 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TN-65 D/S (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The New Holland TN-65 D/S (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 21% (470 kg / 1,036 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Ford 4635 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 18% (800 kg / 1,764 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Ford 4635 (A) and New Holland TN-65 D/S (A), with the call on each
Question4635 (A)TN-65 D/S (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?44.2 kW (59.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4635”44.2 kW (59.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN65 D/S”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 4635 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TN-65 D/S (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 4635 (A) and the TN-65 D/S (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 4635 (A) and the TN-65 D/S (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4635”47.4 L/min (12.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN65 D/S”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4635”2,670 kg (5,886 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN65 D/S”AheadThe New Holland TN-65 D/S (A) has 21% more lift (470 kg / 1,036 lb) than the Ford 4635 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,940 kg (8,686 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4635”3,060 kg (6,746 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN65 D/S”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 4635 (A) is 29% heavier (880 kg / 1,940 lb) than the New Holland TN-65 D/S (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4635”4,400 kg (9,700 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN65 D/S”AheadThe Ford 4635 (A) has 18% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the New Holland TN-65 D/S (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4635”16 to 44Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN65 D/S”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 4635”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TN-65 D/S (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4635”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN65 D/S”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 4635”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN65 D/S”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 4635”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the TN-65 D/S (A).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 4635”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN65 D/S”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1996–19981999–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland TN-65 D/S (A) has 21% more lift (470 kg / 1,036 lb) than the Ford 4635 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 4635 (A) is 29% heavier (880 kg / 1,940 lb) than the New Holland TN-65 D/S (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 4635 (A) has 18% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the New Holland TN-65 D/S (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 4635 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TN-65 D/S (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources