Ford 4610 (A) or VOLVO-BM-VALMET 405 (405/4)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 4610 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 405 (405/4) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The VOLVO-BM-VALMET 405 (405/4) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 15% (4.9 L/min / 1.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 4610 (A) | 405 (405/4) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 44.9 kW (60.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4610” | 44.9 kW (60.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 405” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 4610 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 405 (405/4) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 4610 (A) and the 405 (405/4). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 4610 (A) and the 405 (405/4). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 31.7 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4610” | 36.6 L/min (9.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 405” | AheadThe VOLVO-BM-VALMET 405 (405/4) has 15% more hydraulic flow (4.9 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Ford 4610 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,928 kg (4,251 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4610” | 1,805 kg (3,979 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 405” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 4610 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4610”); the 405 (405/4): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 405”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,790 kg (6,151 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4610” | 2,710 kg (5,975 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 405” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 4610 (A) and the 405 (405/4). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4610” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 405” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 4610 (A) and the 405 (405/4). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4610” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 405” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 4610” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 405” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 4610” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 405” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 4610” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 405” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1981–1991 | 1985 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The VOLVO-BM-VALMET 405 (405/4) has 15% more hydraulic flow (4.9 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Ford 4610 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 4610 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 405 (405/4) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 4610 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4610”); the 405 (405/4): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 405”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources