Ford 4.000 or SOMECA SOM-511?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 4.000 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SOM-511 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The SOMECA SOM-511 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 163% (923 kg / 2,035 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Ford 4.000 suits road haulage better on this data: 36% (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 4.000 | SOM-511 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4000 (USA)” | 40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 511” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 4.000 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SOM-511 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 4.000 and the SOM-511. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 4.000 and the SOM-511. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 15.1 L/min (4.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4000 (USA)” | 15.2 L/min (4.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 511” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 567 kg (1,250 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4000 (USA)” | 1,490 kg (3,285 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 511” | AheadThe SOMECA SOM-511 has 163% more lift (923 kg / 2,035 lb) than the Ford 4.000 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,434 kg (3,161 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4000 (USA)” | 2,525 kg (5,567 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 511” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SOMECA SOM-511 is 76% heavier (1,091 kg / 2,405 lb) than the Ford 4.000 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 4.000 and the SOM-511. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 4 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4000 (USA)” | 7Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 511” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 4.000 and the SOM-511. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4000 (USA)” | 22 km/h (13.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 511” | AheadThe Ford 4.000 has 36% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the SOMECA SOM-511 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 4000 (USA)” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 511” | AheadThe Ford 4.000 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SOMECA SOM-511 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 4000 (USA)” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 511” | AheadThe SOMECA SOM-511 has an independent PTO; the Ford 4.000’s is dependent (stops with the clutch). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 4000 (USA)” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Someca SOM 511” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1962–1965 | 1964–1965 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The SOMECA SOM-511 has 163% more lift (923 kg / 2,035 lb) than the Ford 4.000 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The SOMECA SOM-511 is 76% heavier (1,091 kg / 2,405 lb) than the Ford 4.000 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 4.000 has 36% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the SOMECA SOM-511 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 4.000 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SOMECA SOM-511 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The SOMECA SOM-511 has an independent PTO; the Ford 4.000’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 4.000 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SOM-511 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources