Ford 3610 vs Leyland 255
8 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 3610 and the 255 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
8 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 3610 | 255 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 46.4 hp | 55 hp | +18% 255 |
| Engine declared | — | LEYLAND-MOTORS 4/98 DT | — |
| Displacement declared | — | 3.77 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 132 lb·ft · 179.5 N·m | 160 lb·ft · 217 N·m | +21% 255 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 16.2 mph · 26 km/h | +15% 3610 |
| Clutch declared | — | Dry BORG & BECK double clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 7.2 gpm · 27.4 L/min | 7.8 gpm · 29.5 L/min | +8% 255 |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 3,115 lb · 1,413 kg | 4,134 lb · 1,875 kg | +33% 255 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 5,335 lb · 2,420 kg | 5,445 lb · 2,470 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 75.8 in · 1,925 mm | 79.9 in · 2,029 mm | +5% 255 |
| Length declared | 128.0 in · 3,250 mm | 131.5 in · 3,340 mm | — |
| Width declared | 64.6 in · 1,640 mm | 63.8 in · 1,621 mm | — |
| Height declared | 84.6 in · 2,150 mm | 92.9 in · 2,360 mm | +10% 255 |
| Ground clearance declared | 12.4 in · 315 mm | 16.9 in · 429 mm | +36% 255 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 10.1 ft · 3.07 m | 10.5 ft · 3.20 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 52.0 qt · 49.2 L | 72.0 qt · 68.1 L | +38% 255 |
Ford 3610 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3610”
Leyland 255 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 255”