Ford 3055 (A) or Massey Ferguson MF 155?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 3055 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 155 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 30% (380 kg / 838 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 3055 (A) | MF 155 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 39.7 kW (53.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | 39.7 kW (53.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 3055 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 3055 (A) and the MF 155. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 3055 (A) and the MF 155. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 16.4 L/min (4.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 3055 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,270 kg (2,800 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | 1,650 kg (3,638 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 155 has 30% more lift (380 kg / 838 lb) than the Ford 3055 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,916 kg (4,224 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | 2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 155 is 15% heavier (284 kg / 626 lb) than the Ford 3055 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 3055 (A) and the MF 155. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 3055 (A) and the MF 155. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 155. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155” | AheadThe Ford 3055 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson MF 155 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1971–1975 | 1969–1976 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson MF 155 has 30% more lift (380 kg / 838 lb) than the Ford 3055 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 155 is 15% heavier (284 kg / 626 lb) than the Ford 3055 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 3055 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson MF 155 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 3055 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources