Ford 2910 or Massey Ferguson MF 245?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Ford 2910: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on top speed.
- The Ford 2910 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 46% (9.2 L/min / 2.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Ford 2910 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 2910 | MF 245 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 26.9 kW (36.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2910” | 26.6 kW (35.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 245” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2910 and the MF 245. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2910 and the MF 245. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 29.0 L/min (7.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2910” | 19.8 L/min (5.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 245” | AheadThe Ford 2910 has 46% more hydraulic flow (9.2 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 245 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,682 kg (5,913 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2910” | 1,650 kg (3,638 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 245” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 2910: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2910”); the MF 245: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 245”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2910” | 1,990 kg (4,387 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 245” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 2910 is 11% heavier (210 kg / 463 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 245 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2910 and the MF 245. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2910” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 245” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2910 and the MF 245. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30.0 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2910” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 245” | AheadThe Ford 2910 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson MF 245 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 2910” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 245” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 2910” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 245. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 2910” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 245” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1983–1991 | 1976–1983 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 2910 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Ford 2910 has 46% more hydraulic flow (9.2 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 245 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 2910 is 11% heavier (210 kg / 463 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 245 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 2910 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson MF 245 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 2910 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 2910: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2910”); the MF 245: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 245”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources