Ford 2610 or Schlüter Super 400 / 400 V?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 2610 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Super 400 / 400 V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Schlüter Super 400 / 400V suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 19% (341 kg / 752 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 2610 | Super 400 / 400 V | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 30.2 kW (40.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | 30.7 kW (41.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 400 / 400 V” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2610 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Super 400 / 400 V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2610 and the Super 400 / 400 V. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2610 and the Super 400 / 400 V. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Super 400 / 400 V. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,413 kg (3,115 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | 1,500 kg (3,307 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 400 / 400 V” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 2610: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610”); the Super 400 / 400 V: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 400 / 400 V”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,804 kg (3,977 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | 2,145 kg (4,729 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 400 / 400 V” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Schlüter Super 400 / 400V is 19% heavier (341 kg / 752 lb) than the Ford 2610 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2610 and the Super 400 / 400 V. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 400 / 400 V” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 400 / 400 V” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2610. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 29 km/h (18.0 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | 20.0 km/h (12.4 mph) to 28.1 km/h (17.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 400 / 400 V” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | 615/1230 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 400 / 400 V” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Super 400 / 400 V. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 400 / 400 V” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 2610. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 400 / 400 V” | AheadThe Schlüter Super 400 / 400V is available with four-wheel drive; the Ford 2610 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1981–1983 | 1966–1968 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 2610 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Schlüter Super 400 / 400V is 19% heavier (341 kg / 752 lb) than the Ford 2610 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Schlüter Super 400 / 400V is available with four-wheel drive; the Ford 2610 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Ford 2610 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2610 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Super 400 / 400 V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 2610: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610”); the Super 400 / 400 V: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 400 / 400 V”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources