Ford 2600 vs Renault R-57

8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1975–1981

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1967–1972

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 2600 and the R-57 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

8 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Ford 2600 and Renault R-57, field by field
Field	2600	R-57	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	37.4 hp	42.4 hp	+13% R-57
Engine declared	—	ALFA-SAVIEM 714/30.01	—
Displacement declared	—	2.49 L	—
Maximum torque declared	—	109 lb·ft · 148 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	+20% 2600
Clutch declared	—	Two-stage pedal-operated dry FERODO double clutch	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	8.3 gpm · 31.4 L/min	5.6 gpm · 21.2 L/min	+48% 2600
Three-point lift at ends declared	2,800 lb · 1,270 kg	4,409 lb · 2,000 kg	+57% R-57
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	3,816 lb · 1,731 kg	4,101 lb · 1,860 kg	+7% R-57
Wheelbase declared	75.8 in · 1,925 mm	76.0 in · 1,930 mm	—
Length declared	127.0 in · 3,226 mm	128.0 in · 3,250 mm	—
Width declared	65.5 in · 1,664 mm	59.1 in · 1,500 mm	+11% 2600
Height declared	88.5 in · 2,248 mm	61.4 in · 1,560 mm	+44% 2600
Ground clearance declared	21.7 in · 550 mm	16.5 in · 420 mm	+31% 2600
Turning radius, braked declared	9.6 ft · 2.93 m	9.8 ft · 2.98 m	—
Fuel tank declared	51.9 qt · 49.1 L	58.1 qt · 55.0 L	+12% R-57

Source

Source