Ford 2600 vs Massey Ferguson MF 350
9 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 2600 and the MF 350 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
9 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 2600 | MF 350 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 37.4 hp | 46.4 hp | +24% MF 350 |
| Engine declared | — | Perkins AD 3.152 | — |
| Displacement declared | — | 2.50 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | — | 128 lb·ft · 174 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | — | Pedal operated, dry and air-cooled double clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 8.3 gpm · 31.4 L/min | 5.0 gpm · 19.0 L/min | +65% 2600 |
| Pressure declared | — | 2,466 psi · 170 bar | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 2,800 lb · 1,270 kg | 4,079 lb · 1,850 kg | +46% MF 350 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540/1789 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,816 lb · 1,731 kg | 5,796 lb · 2,629 kg | +52% MF 350 |
| Wheelbase declared | 75.8 in · 1,925 mm | 82.0 in · 2,083 mm | +8% MF 350 |
| Length declared | 127.0 in · 3,226 mm | 137.4 in · 3,490 mm | +8% MF 350 |
| Width declared | 65.5 in · 1,664 mm | 70.1 in · 1,780 mm | +7% MF 350 |
| Height declared | 88.5 in · 2,248 mm | 89.4 in · 2,270 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 21.7 in · 550 mm | 8.8 in · 224 mm | +146% 2600 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 9.6 ft · 2.93 m | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 51.9 qt · 49.1 L | 71.9 qt · 68 L | +38% MF 350 |
Ford 2600 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2600”
Massey Ferguson MF 350 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 350”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 148”