Ford 2000 (USA) vs RÖHR R 35
8 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 2000 (USA) and the R 35 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
8 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 2000 (USA) | R 35 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 35.3 hp | 35.5 hp | — |
| Engine declared | — | MWM KD 215 D | — |
| Displacement declared | — | 3.53 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 121 lb·ft · 164 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 17.4 mph · 28 km/h | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | +40% 2000 (USA) |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated dry double clutch | Pedal operated dry single plate clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 1,250 lb · 567 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,018 lb · 1,369 kg | 4,167 lb · 1,890 kg | +38% R 35 |
| Wheelbase declared | 75.7 in · 1,924 mm | 76.4 in · 1,940 mm | — |
| Length declared | 120.8 in · 3,069 mm | 122.8 in · 3,120 mm | — |
| Width declared | 63.9 in · 1,623 mm | 61.0 in · 1,550 mm | — |
| Height declared | 56.9 in · 1,446 mm | 66.9 in · 1,700 mm | +18% R 35 |
| Ground clearance declared | 20.5 in · 521 mm | 13.8 in · 350 mm | +49% 2000 (USA) |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 8.9 ft · 2.72 m | 9.8 ft · 3.00 m | +10% R 35 |
| Fuel tank declared | 52.0 qt · 49.2 L | 31.7 qt · 30.0 L | +64% 2000 (USA) |
Ford 2000 (USA) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2000 (USA)”
RÖHR R 35 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Röhr R 35”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Titus U 35”