Ford 2000 (USA) vs Renault 361
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 2000 (USA) and the 361 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
10 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 2000 (USA) | 361 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 35.3 hp | 35.5 hp | — |
| Engine declared | — | MWM D 325-3 | — |
| Displacement declared | — | 2.55 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 121 lb·ft · 164 N·m | 105 lb·ft · 142 N·m | +15% 2000 (USA) |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 17.4 mph · 28 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | +12% 2000 (USA) |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated dry double clutch | Dry Verto double clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | — | 6.8 gpm · 25.9 L/min | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 1,250 lb · 567 kg | 4,497 lb · 2,040 kg | +260% 361 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,018 lb · 1,369 kg | 4,817 lb · 2,185 kg | +60% 361 |
| Wheelbase declared | 75.7 in · 1,924 mm | 78.0 in · 1,982 mm | — |
| Length declared | 120.8 in · 3,069 mm | 130.4 in · 3,312 mm | +8% 361 |
| Width declared | 63.9 in · 1,623 mm | 66.1 in · 1,680 mm | — |
| Height declared | 56.9 in · 1,446 mm | 93.3 in · 2,370 mm | +64% 361 |
| Ground clearance declared | 20.5 in · 521 mm | 15.7 in · 400 mm | +30% 2000 (USA) |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 8.9 ft · 2.72 m | 10.9 ft · 3.31 m | +22% 361 |
| Fuel tank declared | 52.0 qt · 49.2 L | 50.7 qt · 48.0 L | — |
Ford 2000 (USA) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2000 (USA)”
Renault 361 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 361 R7421”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253”