10 material differences · fewer than 12
Tractor oneFord 1900 (A)1979–1983No measured PTO figureTractor twoWHITE 2-321984–1986No measured PTO figure
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 1900 (A) and the 2-32 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
10 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 1900 (A) | 2-32 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 28.3 hp | 27.6 hp | — |
| Engine declared | ISHIKAWAJIMA-SHIBAURA LEM-853 | ISUZU 4 FA 1 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 1.43 L | 1.49 L | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 13.7 mph · 22 km/h | 13.7 mph · 22 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated dry DAIKIN dual clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic centre declared | — | Open centre | — |
| Pump flow declared | 7.8 gpm · 29.5 L/min | — | — |
| Three-point lift, at the coupling points declared | 3,810 lb · 1,728 kg | 2,712 lb · 1,230 kg | +40% 1900 (A) |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 2,690 lb · 1,220 kg | 2,915 lb · 1,322 kg | +8% 2-32 |
| Wheelbase declared | 63.0 in · 1,600 mm | 70.9 in · 1,801 mm | +13% 2-32 |
| Length declared | 118.5 in · 3,010 mm | 126.1 in · 3,203 mm | +6% 2-32 |
| Width declared | 57.5 in · 1,460 mm | 71.5 in · 1,816 mm | +24% 2-32 |
| Height, over the roll bar declared | 86.2 in · 2,190 mm | 78.8 in · 2,002 mm | +9% 1900 (A) |
| Ground clearance declared | 15.0 in · 380 mm | 14.2 in · 361 mm | +5% 1900 (A) |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 7.9 ft · 2.40 m | 8.4 ft · 2.57 m | +7% 2-32 |
| Fuel tank declared | 30.7 qt · 29.1 L | 42.3 qt · 40.0 L | +37% 2-32 |
Ford 1900 (A) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900”
WHITE 2-32 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-32”