Ford 1900 (A) vs Renault 351 M
12 material differences
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 1900 (A) and the 351 M → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
12 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 1900 (A) | 351 M | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 28.3 hp | 34.6 hp | +22% 351 M |
| Engine declared | ISHIKAWAJIMA-SHIBAURA LEM-853 | MWM D 327-2 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 1.43 L | 1.88 L | +31% 351 M |
| Maximum torque declared | — | 86 lb·ft · 117 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 13.7 mph · 22 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | +14% 351 M |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated dry DAIKIN dual clutch | Dry VERTO double clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 7.8 gpm · 29.5 L/min | 6.5 gpm · 24.6 L/min | +20% 1900 (A) |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 3,810 lb · 1,728 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 2,690 lb · 1,220 kg | 4,321 lb · 1,960 kg | +61% 351 M |
| Wheelbase declared | 63.0 in · 1,600 mm | 73.0 in · 1,854 mm | +16% 351 M |
| Length declared | 118.5 in · 3,010 mm | 125.4 in · 3,184 mm | +6% 351 M |
| Width declared | 57.5 in · 1,460 mm | 66.1 in · 1,680 mm | +15% 351 M |
| Height declared | 86.2 in · 2,190 mm | 92.5 in · 2,350 mm | +7% 351 M |
| Ground clearance declared | 15.0 in · 380 mm | 14.6 in · 370 mm | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 7.9 ft · 2.40 m | 10.4 ft · 3.16 m | +32% 351 M |
| Fuel tank declared | 30.7 qt · 29.1 L | 50.7 qt · 48.0 L | +65% 351 M |
Ford 1900 (A) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900”
Renault 351 M sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 351 M / R 7411”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 50S R7365”