Ford 1620 (A) vs Lamborghini 250 DT

12 material differences

Tractor one

1992–1997

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1992–2003

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 1620 (A) and the 250 DT → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

12 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Ford 1620 (A) and Lamborghini 250 DT, field by field
Field	1620 (A)	250 DT	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	25.6 hp	24.7 hp	—
Engine declared	ISHIKAWAJIMA-SHIBAURA J-843	MITSUBISHI K3 F-D	differs
Displacement declared	1.33 L	1.12 L	+19% 1620 (A)
Maximum torque declared	—	44 lb·ft · 59.8 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	12.4 mph · 20 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	+25% 250 DT
Clutch declared	Wet multi-disc clutch	Pedal operated dry single disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic control declared	—	Load sensing	—
Pump flow declared	7.1 gpm · 26.8 L/min	2.2 gpm · 8.3 L/min	+223% 1620 (A)
Pressure declared	1,421 psi · 98 bar	1,305 psi · 90 bar	+9% 1620 (A)
Three-point lift at ends declared	1,933 lb · 877 kg	2,646 lb · 1,200 kg	+37% 250 DT
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	2,238 lb · 1,015 kg	2,138 lb · 970 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	4,630 lb · 2,100 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	63.0 in · 1,600 mm	60.6 in · 1,540 mm	—
Length declared	112.2 in · 2,850 mm	105.9 in · 2,690 mm	+6% 1620 (A)
Width declared	48.0 in · 1,220 mm	44.1 in · 1,120 mm	+9% 1620 (A)
Height declared	84.3 in · 2,140 mm	77.2 in · 1,960 mm	+9% 1620 (A)
Ground clearance declared	11.4 in · 290 mm	11.4 in · 290 mm	—
Turning radius, braked declared	—	8.5 ft · 2.60 m	—
Fuel tank declared	28.5 qt · 27.0 L	30.6 qt · 29.0 L	+7% 250 DT

Source

Source