Ford 1000 vs International Harvester 323
8 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 1000 and the 323 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
8 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 1000 | 323 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 24.7 hp | 25.6 hp | — |
| Engine declared | ISHIKAWAJIMA-SHIBAURA LE-892 | INTERNATIONAL-HARVESTER DD-111 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 1.27 L | 1.83 L | +43% 323 |
| Maximum torque declared | — | 80 lb·ft · 109 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | — | Pedal operated dry Fichtel and Sachs single disc clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 4.2 gpm · 15.9 L/min | 6.6 gpm · 25.0 L/min | +57% 323 |
| Pressure declared | — | 3,553 psi · 245 bar | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 1,698 lb · 770 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 2,690 lb · 1,220 kg | 4,136 lb · 1,876 kg | +54% 323 |
| Wheelbase declared | 62.6 in · 1,590 mm | 71.5 in · 1,815 mm | +14% 323 |
| Length declared | 100.8 in · 2,560 mm | 124.6 in · 3,165 mm | +24% 323 |
| Width declared | — | 64.6 in · 1,642 mm | — |
| Height declared | 54.3 in · 1,380 mm | 56.5 in · 1,434 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 13.4 in · 340 mm | 14.3 in · 363 mm | +7% 323 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | — | 9.4 ft · 2.85 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 23.2 qt · 22.0 L | 63.4 qt · 60.0 L | +173% 323 |
Ford 1000 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1000”
International Harvester 323 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick 323”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-324 Farmall”