Ford 1000 or Ford 1700 (A)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Ford 1700 (A): hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on forward gears and drive.
- The Ford 1700 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 86% (13.6 L/min / 3.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 125% (960 kg / 2,116 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Ford 1700 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1000 | 1700 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 17.2 kW (23.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1000” | 17.2 kW (23.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1700” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1000 and the 1700 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1000 and the 1700 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 15.9 L/min (4.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1000” | 29.5 L/min (7.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1700” | AheadThe Ford 1700 (A) has 86% more hydraulic flow (13.6 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Ford 1000 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 770 kg (1,698 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1000” | 1,730 kg (3,814 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1700” | AheadThe Ford 1700 (A) has 125% more lift (960 kg / 2,116 lb) than the Ford 1000 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,220 kg (2,690 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1000” | 1,110 kg (2,447 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1700” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1000 and the 1700 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 9Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1000” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1700” | AheadThe Ford 1700 (A) has 33% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Ford 1000 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1000 and the 1700 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1000” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1700” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 1000” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 1700” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1000 and the 1700 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 1000” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 1700” | AheadThe Ford 1700 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Ford 1000 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1973–1976 | 1979–1982 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 1700 (A) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Ford 1700 (A) has 86% more hydraulic flow (13.6 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Ford 1000 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 1700 (A) has 125% more lift (960 kg / 2,116 lb) than the Ford 1000 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 1700 (A) has 33% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Ford 1000 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 1700 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Ford 1000 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Ford 1700 (A) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources