Fiat TS 115 or Renault 110-14 TS?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault 110-14 TS: three-point lift.

  • The Renault 110-14 TS suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 30% (1,680 kg / 3,704 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat TS 115 and Renault 110-14 TS, with the call on each
QuestionTS 115110-14 TSCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?68.6 kW (92.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TS115”68.2 kW (91.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TS 115 and the 110-14 TS.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TS 115 and the 110-14 TS.
Which pumps more oil for implements?43.4 L/min (11.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the TS 115.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,580 kg (12,302 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TS115”7,260 kg (16,006 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912”AheadThe Renault 110-14 TS has 30% more lift (1,680 kg / 3,704 lb) than the Fiat TS 115 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,802 kg (10,587 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TS115”5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TS115”8,100 kg (17,857 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TS115”16Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TS 115 and the 110-14 TS.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TS115”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TS115”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the TS 115.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TS115”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 110-14 TS/TX/TZ R7912”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–20031986–1989Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat TS 115 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 110-14 TS has 30% more lift (1,680 kg / 3,704 lb) than the Fiat TS 115 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat TS 115 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources