Fiat TL 80 (DT) or VALMET 800?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Fiat TL 80 (DT) is ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The Fiat TL 80 (DT) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat TL 80 (DT) and VALMET 800, with the call on each
QuestionTL 80 (DT)800Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?49.2 kW (66.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TL80”49.5 kW (66.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 800”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TL 80 (DT) and the 800.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TL 80 (DT) and the 800.
Which pumps more oil for implements?60.0 L/min (15.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TL80”55.7 L/min (14.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 800”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,350 kg (7,385 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TL80”3,365 kg (7,419 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 800”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,150 kg (9,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TL80”3,330 kg (7,341 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 800”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat TL 80 (DT) is 25% heavier (820 kg / 1,808 lb) than the VALMET 800 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TL80”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 800.
Which has the wider choice of gears?20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TL80”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 800”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TL 80 (DT) and the 800.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TL80”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 800”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TL80”540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 800”AheadThe Fiat TL 80 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 800 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TL80”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 800”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri TL80”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 800”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–20041997–2002EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat TL 80 (DT) is 25% heavier (820 kg / 1,808 lb) than the VALMET 800 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat TL 80 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 800 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources