Fiat M 160 or VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 2105?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Fiat M 160: hydraulic flow and maximum permissible mass.
- The Fiat M 160 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 61% (37.4 L/min / 9.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Fiat M 160 suits road haulage better on this data: 11% (925 kg / 2,039 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | M 160 | Volvo 2105 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 109.4 kW (146.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | 108.7 kW (145.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2105” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the M 160 and the Volvo 2105. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the M 160 and the Volvo 2105. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 98.4 L/min (26.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | 61.0 L/min (16.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2105” | AheadThe Fiat M 160 has 61% more hydraulic flow (37.4 L/min / 9.9 gpm) than the VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 2105 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,680 kg (14,727 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | 4,782 kg (10,543 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2105” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the M 160: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”); the Volvo 2105: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2105”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,080 kg (13,404 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | 6,395 kg (14,099 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2105” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 9,500 kg (20,944 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | 8,575 kg (18,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2105” | AheadThe Fiat M 160 has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (925 kg / 2,039 lb) than the VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 2105 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | 14 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2105” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the M 160 and the Volvo 2105. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2105” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2105” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2105” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the M 160. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2105” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1996–1999 | 1985–1987 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat M 160 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fiat M 160 has 61% more hydraulic flow (37.4 L/min / 9.9 gpm) than the VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 2105 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Fiat M 160 has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (925 kg / 2,039 lb) than the VOLVO-BM-VALMET Volvo 2105 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Fiat M 160 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the M 160: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”); the Volvo 2105: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo 2105”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources