Fiat M 160 or VALMET 8550?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Fiat M 160: hydraulic flow and maximum permissible mass. On features, the VALMET 8550 is ahead on forward gears.

  • The Fiat M 160 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 34% (24.8 L/min / 6.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Fiat M 160 suits road haulage better on this data: 12% (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat M 160 and VALMET 8550, with the call on each
QuestionM 1608550Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?109.4 kW (146.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”108.1 kW (145.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the M 160 and the 8550.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the M 160 and the 8550.
Which pumps more oil for implements?98.4 L/min (26.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”73.6 L/min (19.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”AheadThe Fiat M 160 has 34% more hydraulic flow (24.8 L/min / 6.6 gpm) than the VALMET 8550 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,680 kg (14,727 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”6,900 kg (15,212 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the M 160: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”); the 8550: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,080 kg (13,404 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”5,100 kg (11,244 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat M 160 is 19% heavier (980 kg / 2,161 lb) than the VALMET 8550 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,500 kg (20,944 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”AheadThe Fiat M 160 has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the VALMET 8550 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”AheadThe VALMET 8550 has 50% more forward gears (12 gears) than the Fiat M 160 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the M 160 and the 8550.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the M 160.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1996–19991995–2001EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat M 160 has 34% more hydraulic flow (24.8 L/min / 6.6 gpm) than the VALMET 8550 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat M 160 is 19% heavier (980 kg / 2,161 lb) than the VALMET 8550 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat M 160 has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the VALMET 8550 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 8550 has 50% more forward gears (12 gears) than the Fiat M 160 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the M 160: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”); the 8550: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources