Fiat M 135 or Renault 145-14 TX?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the M 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 145-14 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fiat M 135 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 143% (57.3 L/min / 15.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | M 135 | 145-14 TX | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135” | 99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the M 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 145-14 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the M 135 and the 145-14 TX. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the M 135 and the 145-14 TX. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 97.3 L/min (25.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135” | 40.0 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | AheadThe Fiat M 135 has 143% more hydraulic flow (57.3 L/min / 15.1 gpm) than the Renault 145-14 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,060 kg (11,155 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135” | 5,100 kg (11,244 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the M 135: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135”); the 145-14 TX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,356 kg (11,808 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135” | 6,170 kg (13,603 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 145-14 TX is 15% heavier (814 kg / 1,795 lb) than the Fiat M 135 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 145-14 TX. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | AheadThe Fiat M 135 has 50% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Renault 145-14 TX (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the M 135 and the 145-14 TX. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the M 135. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1996–1999 | 1981–1986 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat M 135 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fiat M 135 has 143% more hydraulic flow (57.3 L/min / 15.1 gpm) than the Renault 145-14 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 145-14 TX is 15% heavier (814 kg / 1,795 lb) than the Fiat M 135 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Fiat M 135 has 50% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Renault 145-14 TX (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Fiat M 135 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the M 135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 145-14 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the M 135: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135”); the 145-14 TX: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-14 TX/RE R7942”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources