Fiat M 115 or Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the M 115 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XT 910.6 Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fiat M 115 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 92% (44.8 L/min / 11.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Fiat M 115 suits road haulage better on this data: 14% (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | M 115 | XT 910.6 Turbo | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 84.6 kW (113.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M115” | 84.5 kW (113.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the M 115 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XT 910.6 Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the M 115 and the XT 910.6 Turbo. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the M 115 and the XT 910.6 Turbo. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 93.3 L/min (24.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M115” | 48.5 L/min (12.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo” | AheadThe Fiat M 115 has 92% more hydraulic flow (44.8 L/min / 11.8 gpm) than the Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,740 kg (12,655 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M115” | 4,772 kg (10,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the M 115: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M115”); the XT 910.6 Turbo: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,290 kg (11,662 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M115” | 4,680 kg (10,318 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat M 115 is 13% heavier (610 kg / 1,345 lb) than the Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,000 kg (17,637 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M115” | 7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo” | AheadThe Fiat M 115 has 14% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M115” | 60Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo” | AheadThe Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo has 150% more forward gears (36 gears) than the Fiat M 115 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the M 115 and the XT 910.6 Turbo. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M115” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M115” | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M115” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M115” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1996–1999 | 1999–2004 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fiat M 115 has 92% more hydraulic flow (44.8 L/min / 11.8 gpm) than the Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Fiat M 115 is 13% heavier (610 kg / 1,345 lb) than the Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Fiat M 115 has 14% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo has 150% more forward gears (36 gears) than the Fiat M 115 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the M 115 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XT 910.6 Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the M 115: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M115”); the XT 910.6 Turbo: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6 Turbo”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources